[Non-Sequitur]

Failure to provide a de novo review despite a statutory mandate to do so.

The judge held the held the hearing, the Schindler attorneys present no new evidence, no reason for overturning the original decision. So the judge ruled against them. He abided by the letter of the legislation.

[peyton randolph]

The federal judge deferred to all factual findings made by Judge Greer. This was not de novo review. It was a sham.

[FreedomCalls]

That's fine, but that's not what he was asked to do. He was asked to rehear and reassert the facts of the case -- not verify that the procedures were lawful.

[jdhljc169]

****The judge held the held the hearing, the Schindler attorneys present no new evidence, no reason for overturning the original decision. So the judge ruled against them. He abided by the letter of the legislation.

Do you even know what de novo means? Evidently not from the above post. It doesn't mean "present new evidence."