Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: northernlightsII

Look, I'm not going to go off into the brush regarding the moral impetus behind the law. I said that it was a bad law, constitutionally, and provided my reasons for saying so.


164 posted on 03/31/2005 4:46:21 PM PST by aQ_code_initiate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: aQ_code_initiate

So the Constitution is all about reforming SOC SEC or whatever government program is the pet peeve.
Right to Life is one of the founding principle of the Constitution.
And if that law was that unconstitutional the 1st federal judge would have ssaid so from the get go,same with the appellate court and surely with SCOTUS.
They said nothimg because the one thing they could not say was that it was inconstitutional.
Actually in the last 2weeks I don't think I have heard one reputable lawyer claim it was unconstitutional.


174 posted on 03/31/2005 4:53:31 PM PST by northernlightsII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson