Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's Secret War
FrontPageMag ^ | 3/31/2005 | Patrick Devenny

Posted on 03/31/2005 6:28:37 AM PST by Mr.Clark

When FBI Assistant Director Dan Szady, who heads the agency’s counter-intelligence division, made a rare public appearance to speak at the National Intelligence Conference and Exposition held last month in Alexandria, Virginia, it wasn’t to discuss Iran, Iraq, or any country in the Middle East, as many may have expected. Instead, the 33-year veteran of the Bureau discussed the “huge” threat posed to our national security by the Chinese intelligence apparatus.

His most harrowing charge, among many other disturbing accusations, concerned the existence of an estimated 3,000 Chinese front companies that presently operate within the US. The main purpose of these pseudo-businesses, he said, is to facilitate often-illegal technology transfers to the Chinese government. In a USA Today interview conducted nine months earlier, Szady had detailed the same threat. He suggested that this intensifying Chinese effort was targeting a wide expanse of American assets, including defense research labs and universities.

While some neophytes may have been surprised by the emphasis on China, those with experience in such matters welcomed it as a long awaited realization. The transfer of highly sensitive technology to foreign countries has recently increased exponentially, with the number of cases growing 20 to 30 percent every year, the main culprit being China. The People’s Republic has recently initiated a full-scale assault on sectors critical to America’s national security and economic viability. When combined with its rapidly advancing military and economic power, China’s thriving espionage network within the United States allows it to challenge American power on the world stage.

Flooding the Zone

“Foreknowledge cannot be gotten from ghosts and spirits, cannot be had by analogy, cannot be found out by calculation. It must be obtained from people, people who know the conditions of the enemy”.

-Sun Tzu, The Art of War

The Chinese seem to have taken Sun Tzu’s sage advice to heart. As detailed in the Cox Report of 1997, the Chinese have created an intricate network of spies that continues to provide them with a wide range of classified American technology. As the Cox committee stated forebodingly eight years ago, “The PRC’s appetite for information and technology appears to be insatiable, and the energy devoted to the task enormous.” The Chinese do little to hide their desire for advanced technology, producing intelligence manuals that detail, in exact terms, methods through which agents can procure advanced technical information from American sources. Recently, this strategy appears to have been honed to a sharp edge.

Nowhere is this massive theft felt more acutely than in the heart of America’s technical development industry, Silicon Valley. Rather than dispatching a few agents to the area, the Chinese have “flooded the zone,” enlisting dozens, possibly hundreds, of their own citizens to aid the overall effort. One US intelligence source detailed the strategy, stating to Time Magazine last month that, “The Chinese are very good at putting a lot of people on just a little piece and getting a massive amount of stuff home.” Numerous cases over the past decade have demonstrated the depth and reach of the network. Several of these instances of Chinese espionage have come to the forefront within the past year. The cases that have been uncovered are alarming. But they become terrifying when one considers that they represent only the tip of the iceberg.

Among the most troubling instances is the case of Martin Shih. A 61-year-old Silicon Valley businessman and resident of the United States, Shih owned an impressive coterie of corporations, including Night Vision Technology in San Jose and Queening Hi-Tech in Taiwan. At the same time as Shih ran his profitable international businesses, he was also a critical asset of Chinese intelligence. At Beijing’s behest, Shih shipped cutting edge night vision technology to Chinese technical research centers, such as the North China Research Institute, which are closely linked to the PRC military. Taking his betrayal a step further, Shih traveled to China in June 2002 where he met with Chinese scientists, to whom he imparted the latest American advances in the field. They were then able, with Shih’s invaluable aid, to manufacture optical technology on par with modern American designs. Shih was arrested in May 2004 and faces 45 years in prison. But the damage had been done. Almost single-handedly, Shih destroyed America’s advantage in night optic technology—a critical component of our continuing dominance on the battlefield.

And night vision technology was not the only modern weapon system that China hoped to compromise. Also in Chinese crosshairs was the newest version of the Hellfire anti-tank missile, which utilizes an advanced radar guidance system. In early 1999, the University of Beijing placed an order with a California firm for 25 low-noise amplifier chips that are an important component of the overall guidance system. When unable to make the delivery because of export laws, the California firm was told by the university that they had another supplier. This supplier was Ting-Ih Hsu, a former employee of Lockheed Martin who ran several Orlando based corporations. One of these corporations, Azure Systems, ordered the same chips six months later from a Lockheed subsidiary. Fortunately, this came to the attention of U.S. Customs, which put Mr. Hsu under surveillance. Custom agents witnessed a business associate of Hsu receive the chips, then attempt to send them to Hong Kong, where they were to be forwarded to Beijing Ghz Electronics, a state owned corporation. In 2004, both Hsu and his associate were charged with illegally attempting to export protected technology. The Hsu case is yet another example of China’s unrelenting style in procuring technologies they consider important in their quest to challenge American supremacy.

The list of additional recent Chinese espionage cases is long and disturbing. It includes, among others, the theft of Blackhawk helicopter engines and optical devices by a South Korean man arrested last year. A Chinese-American couple in Wisconsin was arrested in 2004 for sending over $500,000 worth of computer parts to the Chinese government that can be used to improve missile guidance systems. Statements from officials such as Szady hint that cases like these are just a small sample of the overall secret Chinese war against America. Indeed, in the words of one unnamed senior FBI source, “the Chinese are stealing us blind, the 10 year technological advantage we had is vanishing.”

Manning the Gates

To defend itself from this wave of Chinese espionage, America relies on its primary counter-intelligence agency, the FBI. Unfortunately, just as the Chinese efforts against the United States accelerated in the 1990s, the bureau’s political masters saw fit to cripple their ability to counter such a threat. Under the Clinton administration, joining the counter-intelligence division became a good way to ruin a promising FBI career. Funds were cut, hundreds of agents were transferred to other divisions, and morale was at an all-time low. This degradation of America’s counterintelligence defense would set the stage for some high-profile blunders on the part of the FBI.

One such misstep was the controversy surrounding the Taiwanese-American nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee. Lee, who had been an employee at the Los Alamos National Laboratory since 1978, was considered by the FBI to be a major security risk. In 1999, Lee was fired and then imprisoned for nine months on 59 felony counts. His case, however, quickly became a total debacle. In the words of prosecutor and special investigator Randy Bellows, "This investigation was a paradigm of how not to manage and work an important counter-intelligence case.” With the collapse of the investigation, questions concerning Lee’s suspicious actions, such as his transfer of classified nuclear data to computer disks that have never been found, will probably go forever unanswered. The FBI’s mishandling of the Lee counter-intelligence investigation either imprisoned and defamed an innocent man or, quite possibly, allowed an American scientist who would have been considered a top Chinese agent to walk away from his betrayal a free man.

A further disaster was in store for the FBI’s struggling anti-China effort. In the late 1970’s, the FBI recruited Katrina Leung, a Chinese student at the University of Chicago. However, according to government prosecutors, Leung was actually a highly effective Chinese double agent. When Leung was arrested in 2003, she had in her possession extremely sensitive classified documents dealing with the FBI’s efforts against Chinese espionage, including the home phone numbers of FBI counter-intelligence agents. It was revealed early on in the government’s case against Leung that she had conducted relationships with two high ranking FBI agents, giving her access to comprehensive accounts of espionage investigations carried out at government labs, including the inquiry into Wen Ho Lee. The stark conclusion of some FBI counter-intelligence experts was that Leung had fed her Chinese handlers detailed information concerning the investigations, allowing them to tailor their espionage efforts accordingly. The FBI also realized that perhaps Leung’s highly regarded information, which had landed on the desk of four U.S. Presidents, might have all been a wildly successful Chinese disinformation plot. Leung’s case was overturned by a federal judge last month on the grounds of prosecutorial misconduct, a dismissal which is currently being challenged by the government.

With budget cuts, failed investigations, and reckless actions taken by two high ranking agents, the FBI has proven to be a brittle shield against the veritable deluge of Chinese intelligence operatives infiltrating the United States. Fortunately, in the past four years, the FBI leadership seems to have awoken to the threat, with Director Robert Mueller making counter-intelligence his second highest priority, after counter-terrorism. This reemphasis is a long time coming, and will hopefully be continued by administrations that realize the importance of a concerted government effort against Chinese espionage. Still, even with these positive developments, the bureau faces a monumental challenge, considering the scope of the PRC’s espionage effort.

Rooting Out the Network

The Chinese have constructed a spy network whose scope would have impressed even the KGB. The existence of such an apparatus should trouble American policy makers who only recently listened as CIA director Porter Goss testified in unusually blunt terms about China’s efforts to counter American military power throughout Asia. In addition, the Pentagon’s upcoming Quadrennial Defense Review is expected to express a harsher and more realistic view of China’s military ambitions than ever produced before. The Chinese, for their part, have responded with their standard bellicose rhetoric: China has recently approved an “anti-succession law,” which serves as a severe warning to U.S. ally Taiwan.

It is obvious that effective intelligence is a vital part of the Chinese effort to achieve their goal of regional dominance. One senior FBI official put it best: “China is trying to develop a military that can compete with the U.S., and they are willing to steal to get [it]." As they mine the American defense industry for technology, the Chinese also appear to be close to procuring European weapon equipment, allowing them to quickly make up for their deficiency in sophisticated command and control technology. As prominent military experts recently suggested, the European technology represents “The missing pieces of the People's Liberation Army puzzle.”

With their fervent pursuit of American secrets and their newfound ability to purchase advanced western weaponry from our French and German “allies,” the Chinese seem well on their way to achieving their stated goal of effectively countering American military might in the Pacific. While the recent steps taken by the Bush administration against Chinese espionage are promising, it will require a determined government-wide effort—backed by a significant amount of political will—before the United States can begin to root out the powerful Chinese intelligence network in its midst.

Patrick Devenny is the Henry M. Jackson National Security Fellow at the Center for Security Policy in Washington D.C.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: china; geopolitics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
I have been a freeper since I was 15 years old (6 years), and it has really aided my understanding and embrace of conservatism. I just wanted to post this article because it is the first time I have been published, and I wanted to thank everyone at Freerepublic for helping me get there. Comments appreciated.
1 posted on 03/31/2005 6:28:38 AM PST by Mr.Clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark

Save for later reading


2 posted on 03/31/2005 6:30:27 AM PST by NetValue (Be a democrat; oppose, lie, subvert, obstruct , sabotage and blame America first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark

Great article. Well written. And fascinating to read. Probably most of us here are familiar with the threat posed by China, but I surely didn't know most of these details. Good job and congratulations.


3 posted on 03/31/2005 6:33:02 AM PST by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark

Hopefully it’s a wakeup call. For far too long many Americans have relegated China to primitive 3rd World status. They are rapidly catching up.
I wonder about the naval base in California we sold to the PLA.


4 posted on 03/31/2005 6:35:19 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark

"Almost single-handedly, Shih destroyed America’s advantage in night optic technology"

Isn't Multiculturalism a wonderful thing!


5 posted on 03/31/2005 6:41:19 AM PST by odoso (Millions for charity, but not one penny for tribute!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark

http://www.strategypage.com/search.asp?target=c:\inetpub\strategypageroot\dls\docs\200522722.htm&search=spies
The FBI and the Chinese Spy Army
by James Dunnigan
February 27, 2005
Discussion Board on this DLS topic

China has been running a massive intelligence operation against the United States for over two decades. But they are starting to be victims of their own success, as the FBI round up more and more Chinese spies. China has been using a very clever, and effective technique to steal technology, and even military secrets, from the United States. Call it the “swarming spies method.” In the 1980s, China began to send thousands of students to American schools, and many more Chinese managers and technical experts began to visit as well. Chinese intelligence made sure they had a chat with many of these people before they left, and after they came back. The people going to America were asked to bring back anything that might “help the motherland.” Most of these people were not asked to actually act as spies, but simply to share, with Chinese government officials (who were not always identified as intelligence personnel) whatever information they obtained. Of course, it soon became open knowledge in China, and in American intelligence agencies, what was going on.

China has never been energetic at enforcing intellectual property laws. If a Chinese student came back with valuable technical information (obtained in a classroom, in a job, or simply while socializing), the data was often passed on to Chinese companies, or military organizations, that could use it. Since there were few individual Chinese bringing back a lot of data, or material (CDs full of technical data, or actual components or devices), it was difficult for the FBI to catch Chinese “spies”. There were thousands of them, and most were simply going back to China with secrets in their heads. How do you stop that?

The FBI has managed to crack the more ambitious of these spies, the ones caught red handed with actual objects. But most of the swarm moved back to China unhindered. Naturally, the Chinese pushed their system as far as they could. Why not? There was little risk. The Chinese offered large cash rewards for Chinese who could get particularly valuable stuff back to China. Chinese intelligence looked on these "purchases" as strictly commercial transactions. If the Chinese “spies” got caught, they were on their own. The Chinese involved knew the rules. If they were successful, they won favor with the government, or even made a pile of money, and the Chinese government was agreeable to whatever business deals these "patriotic" Chinese tried to put together back in China. This kind of clout is important in China, where a “friend in the government” is more valuable than in the United States.

But more and more of these ambitious Chinese agents are getting caught, largely because the FBI has made the problem known to the American business and academic community. Chinese-Americans, in particular, have been very active in supplying tips to the FBI. The number of arrests the FBI has been making has been going up 20-30 percent a year for the past few years. The FBI has more work than they can handle.

The Chinese are feeling the heat, not that they are in any danger of being cut off from opportunities to steal American technology, though. But the Chinese system has reached its limits, and is being pushed back in some areas. It is thought that the Chinese are responding by trying to terrorize Chinese-Americans, at least those with family back in China, by threatening to make life uncomfortable for family members back in the old country if Chinese-Americans interfere with the spying, or any other Chinese government activities. The Chinese have been discreet with this. The last thing they want is a lot of stories of heavy handed pressure on Chinese-Americans. But arrests of Chinese-Americans back in China on business, or to visit family, sends a message. These arrests, and lesser forms of harassment, make it clear that there can be consequences. The Chinese deny any pressure tactics, but they are feeling the heat from the increased scrutiny of Chinese citizens in the United States, and the growing eagerness of Chinese-Americans to watch for this low level spying, and report it. The down side of the Chinese “swarm” system is that they are using amateur spies. Many don’t even know they are spying, or don't think of themselves as spies. After all, the only thing they are doing is having a long talk with Chinese intelligence officials (usually with a technical expert in attendance), when they get back. Each of these conversations might yield a few useful bits of information. Putting a lot of these bits together and you get something useful, like how to build better jet engines, or nuclear weapons.

There are currently some 19,000 Chinese studying in American schools, and thousands more visiting for business purposes. Most want nothing to do with spying, but very few will refuse a request to have a chat with Chinese intelligence officers when they get home.


6 posted on 03/31/2005 6:45:18 AM PST by Little Ray (I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark

China could never attack, invade and rule America and America could never attack, invade and rule China. No t under any circumstances or conditions.

Other than Taiwan [a big other...I live in Taiwan], I don't see why the relationship has to be confrontational.

Of course, economics is another matter. China now is like the US in the late 19th century, with only [possible] looming environmental and [almost certain] demographic collapse / chaos to hold it back.


7 posted on 03/31/2005 6:54:14 AM PST by johnmilken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

Keep an eye on diplomatic and trade agreements China has made in the past few years in South and Central America. They know we have weak borders and even weaker "friends" to the North and South.

China is developing a long-range strategic objective of trade engagements in our hemisphere. From there, it's just a short step to selling military systems and the advisors to train their Latin hosts how to use them.

It's not a far stretch to imagine (in 20 years or so) Mexico cooperating with China in order to gain back their beloved "Maztlan" from the American Southwest.

GW


8 posted on 03/31/2005 6:56:10 AM PST by gregwest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark
The Chinese have constructed a spy network whose scope would have impressed even the KGB.

I believe that it probably is more impressive than what the Soviet Union managed to build in the 1930s and 1940s. From what little has been published about its successes, the Chinese have done very well indeed.

9 posted on 03/31/2005 6:57:17 AM PST by snowsislander (Isa41:17-When the poor and needy seek water,and there is none,and their tongue faileth for thirst...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark

And the question to be asked is; how many of these Chinese businesses were established during the Clinton adminstration, with blessing.


10 posted on 03/31/2005 7:03:22 AM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnmilken

Quote: China could never attack, invade and rule America and America could never attack, invade and rule China. No t under any circumstances or conditions.


Famous last words. China will not let their economy falter if they cannot get natural resources and are making sweetheart deals with many s. american and african countries literaly in effect knocking the US out of the picture if push comes to shove.

Once China and India really get buzzing they are not going to need little old USA and it's miniscule 300 million people. Especially after they drain our technology and proprietary knowlegde with the help of american ceo's wanting cheap labor to boost their profit margins so they can buy that 2nd yacht or 4th mansion.


11 posted on 03/31/2005 7:03:38 AM PST by superiorslots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

Quote: And the question to be asked is; how many of these Chinese businesses were established during the Clinton adminstration, with blessing

I'm not giving clinton a pass but it started way before him and GW does not care about what's going on either.


12 posted on 03/31/2005 7:05:29 AM PST by superiorslots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: superiorslots

"Once China and India really get buzzing they are not going to need little old USA and it's miniscule 300 million people."

Maybe, but then...that's how it is. They have 2+ billion people and we don't. There's not much we can do about that except try and sell stuff to them and take advantage of the opportunities two huge and booming economies will present. All things wax and wane, but I don't think the US will suffer any severe decline in the lifetime of any Freeper.

I learned Chinese [for kicks, it looked cool in college, plus I had a thing for Asian women] and then moved out here. Free trade is what it is.


13 posted on 03/31/2005 7:10:18 AM PST by johnmilken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark

Bump.


14 posted on 03/31/2005 7:14:47 AM PST by Mr.Clark (From the darkness....I shall come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
We just hope this new effort to weed out that network and stem the tide of the Chinese spies is not " to little , to late " .
Does the USA still have the leading edge of technology in the world ?
And does this lapse by our part have allowed the Chinese or other countries to gain on us in that technology.
15 posted on 03/31/2005 7:31:49 AM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark

Thank you for an excellent article. Red China is a threat to our national security. Free trade will not make the leaders of China peaceful. They are communists who are schooled in terror and its uses for absolute power.


16 posted on 03/31/2005 7:33:20 AM PST by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT
It's the proverbial " small dragon then, BIG dragon now " or " Feeding small monsters will one day make them BIG monsters to hard to contain "
We should have nipped it in the bud when we had the chance.
17 posted on 03/31/2005 7:38:12 AM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark

I didn't see any reference to the most important part of the Chinese war plans; the buying of our government.

There are few, if any, senators, congressmen and beauracrats who don't have Chinese cash in their pockets.

It was this uncomfortable fact that turned an investigation of fraud, extortion, treason and murder into a silly scandal over a fat chick.


18 posted on 03/31/2005 7:42:09 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (It's time to water the tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnmilken

Could never invade?

They already have.


19 posted on 03/31/2005 7:43:25 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (It's time to water the tree!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

Unfortuanetly, FPM has a space limit. I did want to include more on that, maybe that can be another article.


20 posted on 03/31/2005 7:52:43 AM PST by Mr.Clark (From the darkness....I shall come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson