Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: over3Owithabrain

yes, in the same camp as ann coulter, laura ingraham, peggy noonan, mark levin, thomas sowell, ben stein et al. But NONE of them KNOW anything obviously, probably haven't read THE WOLFSON REPORT and are just reacting emotionally to the entire affair...


9 posted on 03/31/2005 5:53:43 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: xsmommy

Gotta go but just had to give you a quick 'LOL!' --- too true bump.


22 posted on 03/31/2005 6:12:18 AM PST by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: xsmommy

Yes, we are all just reactionary right wing nut jobs. It's one thing to get labeled like that from the real nut jobs at the DUmmy site but I'm quite shocked that so many of our so called FRiends have gone into such name calling.


23 posted on 03/31/2005 6:12:36 AM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: xsmommy
yes, in the same camp as ann coulter, laura ingraham, peggy noonan, mark levin, thomas sowell, ben stein et al. But NONE of them KNOW anything obviously, probably haven't read THE WOLFSON REPORT and are just reacting emotionally to the entire affair...

On page 33 Wolfson make the following statement:

"(Descartes addressed this in his proposition that it is our awareness, our consciousness that defines our being: "Cogito, ergo sum." This logic would imply that unless we are aware and conscious, we cease to be.)"

This fallacy of logic is at the heart of his whole thesis. This was noticed by FReeper syriacus HERE from context posted HERE.


(Descartes addressed this in his proposition that it is our awareness, our consciousness that defines our being: "Cogito, ergo sum." This logic would imply that unless we are aware and conscious, we cease to be.)

That's bad logic.

The statement,
"I don't think, therefore, I am not,"
cannot be proven true,
from the truthfulness of the statement,
"I think, therefore I am.

The "I don't think"statement is merely the inverse of the "I think "statement."

Elementary logic: Inverse: The inverse is simply the conditional with ‘not’ added to it.


1.Statement: If p, then q
2. Inverse: If not p, then not q

A statement is not logically equivalent ... to its inverse.

993 posted on 03/30/2005 7:35:37 AM
32 posted on 03/31/2005 6:21:00 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: xsmommy
"in the same camp as ann coulter, laura ingraham, peggy noonan, mark levin, thomas sowell, ben stein et al."

Sounds like good company to me.

"...just reacting emotionally to the entire affair..."

Life and death is a pretty emotional subject.

41 posted on 03/31/2005 6:27:17 AM PST by Sam's Army (RIP Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson