Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ContraryMary
I think you've forgotten that Birch wrote a DISSENTING opinion. In other words, it was not the ruling of the court and holds no effect in law.

I think you haven't read the decision, because, among other things, Justice Birch is the writer concurring with the MAJORITY opinion("BIRCH, Circuit Judge, specially concurring:").

158 posted on 03/31/2005 11:27:19 AM PST by AndrewC (All these moments are tossed in lime, like trains in the rear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC

You're right, I got the names mixed up. I meant to say Judge WILSON wrote a DISSENTING opinion that does not reflect the ruling of the Court and has no effect in law.


179 posted on 03/31/2005 1:11:13 PM PST by ContraryMary (WPPFF Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson