Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rwrcpa1

That's great over time, but the initial shock to the system will be drastic. Sure, they could save more, but it would still take several years. That first few years would be hell for that industry.


79 posted on 03/31/2005 9:22:54 AM PST by RockinRight (Electing Hillary president would be akin to giving a drunken teenage boy keys to the Porsche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: RockinRight

Read the link I gave you in #77.


83 posted on 03/31/2005 9:30:32 AM PST by rwrcpa1 (April 15. Let's make it just another day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight

Yes, and no. Taxes on homes could be phased in, and perhaps even an exemption granted for sites that have been planned and approved for development by the cities and states even if the homes were not yet built. This would allow a certain inventory to be planned out in advance to lessen the blow. There is no hard and fast rule with how to implement the NRST and the major hurdles could be buffered to phase in over a reasonable, but hopefully not too long, a time.

Sure, this may cause a deficit in the short run, but I don't see too many congressmen complaining about deficit spending anyway.


84 posted on 03/31/2005 9:36:08 AM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson