Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Pay for a TV Service That They Didn't Choose
The New York Times ^ | March 31, 2005 | Ken Belson

Posted on 03/31/2005 3:32:02 AM PST by MississippiMasterpiece

Bob Teitelbaum is a sports fanatic who gets his daily fix of football, baseball and basketball games from DirecTV, the satellite television provider. In all, he spends about $150 a month for his premium programming package.

But his household, like every other in his West Palm Beach, Fla., golf community, is also required to pay about $31 a month for cable TV from Adelphia Communications.

The real estate development company that runs Mr. Teitelbaum's community has a deal with Adelphia that obligates every homeowner to subscribe to a standard cable package whether they use it or not.

"That's the rule, so that's what I pay," Mr. Teitelbaum said of the mandatory fee that is included on his quarterly maintenance bill from the property owner's association. "But I hardly watch it. I would pull it if I could."

With new subscribers harder for companies to find, more consumers like Mr. Teitelbaum are being locked into compulsory plans. Among the hottest battlegrounds now for customers in the pay television market are planned communities sprouting up across the Sun Belt and apartments and other multi-unit housing blocks in big cities - basically any development where a homeowners' association or management company charges residents for property upkeep, security and the like.

Cable and satellite providers, of course, love striking these bulk subscriber deals because with one contract they can capture hundreds and sometimes thousands of customers who generate a steady stream of fees for years.

Developers, condo boards and property associations like the deals, too, because they need to work with only one television provider and because the deals can offer homeowners significant discounts for their cable service.

But for homeowners who do not want paid television programming or would rather spend the money on programming available from another provider, the lock-ins amount to a tax.

Cable companies have been making these compulsory deals for years. But in a field they once dominated, they now have to fight with satellite providers, resellers and even the Bell companies, which are fast moving into the video market.

"Like everyone else, we want to be the provider of choice," said Chris Scurto, the vice president in charge of bulk contracts at Charter Communications, the country's fourth-largest cable company. "This is becoming a complex-by-complex battle, a development-by-development battle."

What makes this fight so fierce is the dearth of new subscribers. With approximately 85 percent of American households already paying for some sort of television and the remaining 15 percent unlikely to sign up for any service, cable and satellite providers are increasingly chasing each other's customers.

"Everyone who is going to pay for TV already pays for it," said Todd Mitchell, an industry analyst at Kaufman Brothers Equity Research. "The only people without it are Luddites and people too old to appreciate it."

While industrywide data on exclusive contracts is unavailable, many pay television providers say the number of new customers acquired through bulk deals is growing faster than the number of new customers over all. Of the roughly 20 million housing units in apartment blocks or communities governed by an association, industry analysts and company executives say, from two million to three million are locked into a bulk deal. Cable companies typically try to reach agreements with developers before they start construction so they can lay fiber optic cable in the ground before all the roads are paved. That also allows them to share the cost of laying the cable with the phone company, electric utility and others who are also installing equipment.

The Comcast Corporation, the country's largest cable provider, said it spent $133 million in 2004 to reach new agreements with landlords of apartment complexes and other multidwelling units. Comcast, like other companies, does not release information on how many of its subscribers are included in these compulsory contracts.

While cable companies have most of these contracts, satellite providers have made gains in this market. Robert Grosz, the director of commercial sales for EchoStar, which runs the Dish Network, said his company's bulk subscriber sales had enjoyed "strong double-digit growth" for the last five years.

Satellite companies have also been pitching their services in apartment buildings, once cable's stronghold.

For years, satellite providers found it hard to sell in apartment towers because landlords were reluctant to have satellite dishes mounted outside every unit. Nowadays, satellite companies install a dish on the roof and use existing coaxial lines installed by a cable company to get television signals inside the building.

Bulk deals with apartment buildings are particularly attractive because such deals do not need a franchise or right-of-way agreement with the local municipality.

To win a contract, cable and satellite providers offer discounts of 30 percent or more, according to many companies. Often, landlords sign deals that obligate residents to buy a standard package of about 75 channels. Mr. Teitelbaum and his neighbors, for instance, pay 36 percent below the retail rate for his standard cable plan. Residents who want, say, digital channels, a digital video recorder or a high-speed Internet line pay extra for those features.

People like Mr. Teitelbaum who want programming offered by a rival company, however, must pay redundant fees.

Two years ago, Steve Santos, who lives in Mr. Teitelbaum's development and pays for Adelphia cable service, ordered satellite television from EchoStar. Mr. Santos, who spends about $70 a month for the extra television service, signed up with Dish Network because it offered a digital video recorder that Adelphia did not offer at the time.

Adelphia now offers its own digital video recorder, but Mr. Santos has not pulled the plug on Dish, because he is reluctant to change what is not broken.

"I could get a premium television plan from Adelphia, but it's easier and it's here," he said, referring to his satellite service.

Mr. Santos uses the basic cable service for the televisions in his spare rooms. Still, with two television services, Mr. Santos says, "I can never find anything to watch."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Steve Santos, of West Palm Beach, Fla., likes EchoStar satellite, but must pay for Adelphia cable as well.

1 posted on 03/31/2005 3:32:02 AM PST by MississippiMasterpiece
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
Cable could not survive without the complex web of regulation that surrounds it.

Until recently, I had to pay a $3/month fee for DirectTV because I live in a rural area. The fee was intended to equalize the cost of cable and satellite-passed by Congress, certainly the result of bribes.

What business is it of Congress whether or not a cable company can exist in my neck of the woods? None.

2 posted on 03/31/2005 3:36:13 AM PST by Jim Noble (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

We are all paying for a service whether we want it or not: We are paying an army of lawyers to police the health care system. It's a hidden tax that nobody can afford to pay. That's why health care is unaffordable; we're paying for past and future plaintiffs' awards, sometimes as much as 70% of which goes to the plaintiffs' lawyers.


3 posted on 03/31/2005 3:47:17 AM PST by Savage Beast (There is nothing liberal about the Left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Many of us who have cable are paying for services we do not want. Most of it is worthless junk.


4 posted on 03/31/2005 3:51:08 AM PST by RAY (They that do right are all heroes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RAY

Junk like MTV are included in most "packages".


5 posted on 03/31/2005 3:53:19 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

So what, we're all paying for government services we don't approve of.


6 posted on 03/31/2005 3:56:16 AM PST by rabidralph ("I want that."--Wife in Napoleon Dynamite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
the deals can offer homeowners significant discounts for their cable service.

$31/mo for basic cable isn't a discount, much less a significant one.

7 posted on 03/31/2005 3:56:16 AM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Avoid HOAs and only pay for what you need.


8 posted on 03/31/2005 3:56:43 AM PST by Koblenz (Holland: a very tolerant country. Until someone shoots you on a public street in broad daylight...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAY

Yes but TV ala cart is coming soon, well, soon meaning in next few years.


9 posted on 03/31/2005 3:58:06 AM PST by eastforker (Ask me about a free satellite TV system!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

We have six broadcast channels and a rabbit-ear antenna.

We have never had cable
and never will.

We choose the movies we rent.


10 posted on 03/31/2005 4:01:30 AM PST by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

For the CATV industry to go ala cart its gonna require a bunch of capital on the front end and the way that the signals are processed will have to be redone in over 80% of thier Headends.


11 posted on 03/31/2005 4:12:51 AM PST by Rightly Biased (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Working for CATV I have some insight.

The satellite services are hurting the CATV industry I don't care what they tell you they need the government to intervene on their behalf.(I'm not saying that is a good thing I just know that its true)

I don't see CATV surviving in a Town or group of towns where they can't maintain over 7k-10k subscribers.The fiber infrastructure is mostly built now and CATV is just trying to survive. Unless the industry can match what DBS(satellite) offers in picture quality and types of services they are in trouble.

RB
12 posted on 03/31/2005 4:20:00 AM PST by Rightly Biased (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
The real estate development company that runs Mr. Teitelbaum's community has a deal with Adelphia that obligates every homeowner to subscribe to a standard cable package whether they use it or not.

And, this, is why I hate HOAs and will never live anywhere that has one.
13 posted on 03/31/2005 4:26:35 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Benefits of buying into a covenant community.


14 posted on 03/31/2005 4:29:35 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edwin hubble

But... but... but... You live without knowing the greatest cultural achievements ever made by human beings upon this earth? No "Sopranos?" No "Sex and the City?" No Bryant Gumbel?

In the immortal words of Adam West: Poor, deluded child.


15 posted on 03/31/2005 4:33:26 AM PST by Norman Conquest (Kerry "honors a faith tradition." Bush believes in "God." You do the math.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
I can not understand why anyone would subject themselves to yet another bureaucracy like a Home Owners Association. We have to tolerate the Feds, the State and county and city regulations.

We have a choice about submitting to HOAs. If you choose an HOA, deal with your choice and shut up.

16 posted on 03/31/2005 4:33:31 AM PST by Jeff Gordon (Recall Barbara Boxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

The package is the product. Buy the product or don't buy the product. If enough people don't buy the product and cite as the reason why, the requirement to purchase the additional cable package, then the satellite TV providers will have to take notice. It's called the free market at work.


17 posted on 03/31/2005 4:35:44 AM PST by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rightly Biased
The satellite services are hurting the CATV industry I don't care what they tell you they need the government to intervene on their behalf.

So?

18 posted on 03/31/2005 4:36:10 AM PST by Jim Noble (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
"Everyone who is going to pay for TV already pays for it," said Todd Mitchell, an industry analyst at Kaufman Brothers Equity Research. "The only people without it are Luddites and people too old to appreciate it."

Well, I guess that means I'm old.

19 posted on 03/31/2005 4:36:27 AM PST by AlbertWang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Agree that it is none of the business of Congress. Telephone subscribers currently pay $1.50 per month to a "Universal Service Fund". This is a lot of money. Take the number of lines times 12 times the fee and you have a bucket of money. This fund is for providing wire line telephone service to rural areas. Now is it the business of Congress to provide service to these areas? Or is it their business to subsidize local exchange carriers in these areas? Congress can be stupid and erode our freedoms $1.50 at a time.
20 posted on 03/31/2005 4:36:38 AM PST by Investment Biker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson