To: supercat
Yes. I've been fortunate to develop an intimate understanding of how appellate courts work. Far too many people do not, nor will they ever.
Congress is presumed by rule of law to have acted in a Constitutional manner. The fact that Greer didn't explain his credibility rulings is absolutely a legitimate reason to act as they did.
To: Kryptonite
How was he supposed to explain his credibility rulings? He found the Michael Schiavo doctors to be more convincing, at least partially because they weren't rebutted in court. (I haven't seen the actual court transcripts, just his ruling dated February, 2000.)
207 posted on
03/30/2005 10:50:24 PM PST by
Dolphy
(Fear The Greer(s))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson