Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schiavo parents plan new US Supreme Court appeal (Supreme Court rejects appeal)
Agence France-Presse ^ | 3/31 GMT | AFP

Posted on 03/30/2005 4:10:20 PM PST by Jim W N

PINELLAS PARK, United States (AFP) - As a brain-damaged woman passed her 12th day without food or drink in a hospice here, Terri Schiavo's parents are planning to again petition the US Supreme Court to intervene, their lawyer said.

As a brain-damaged woman passed her 12th day without food or drink in a hospice here, Terri Schiavo's parents are planning to again petition the US Supreme Court to intervene, their lawyer said. Bob and Mary Schindler have been rebuffed by a series of courts in recent weeks and days, their latest setback came Wednesday after the 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals rejected their appeal to reopen the case into whether their daughter's feeding tube should be reinserted.

But the woman's parents appear set to continue waging their legal battle.

"I can confirm for you that we are now preparing to file an appeal with the United States Supreme Court," the Schindler's lawyer, Steve Kluth, said in a statement issued by his office.

However, the Schindlers have already been rebuffed once by the US' highest court in Washington on March 24.

Terri Schaivo's feeding tube was removed March 18, triggering an intense legal battle and a right-to-life political storm that sparked the involvement of the US Congress and US President George W. Bush.

Bush signed legislation backing a federal court review of Terri's case -- she has been in a persistent vegitative state for 15 years -- but the federal courts have so far declined to intervene on her behalf.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: schindleristas; terribots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 381-393 next last
To: Repub4bush

That is what is so sad to me. Terri was also showing signs of improvement until her husband ordered it stopped. Just b/c you have brain damage doesn't mean you can't have a life. It's nice that your story has a happy ending where the person is getting the help she needs and has medical staff that seem to truly care about her. If only Terri had the same care...how tragic.


181 posted on 03/30/2005 7:41:40 PM PST by American72 (Sick of Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

"This cheapening of the true evil of the Nazi regime is sickening. Every time they use the "comparison," the ability to discern real evil is further blurred."

THaaaaaaaaaat's right. We forgot. There are hierarchies of evil. Some people own it, some don't.

Thank goodness that's cleared up.


182 posted on 03/30/2005 7:45:25 PM PST by Tulsa Ramjet (home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Hydrating her is dangerous compared to what? Letting her dehydrate and die?

What about dialyzing her or otherwise controlling blood contaminants?

183 posted on 03/30/2005 7:47:07 PM PST by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: supercat

SCOTUS denied to hear per Scarborough


184 posted on 03/30/2005 7:48:39 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

But perhaps one of the nine USSC judges can say "Put the Tube back in until we do consider it."

Sort of, pardon me, like a "stay of execution."


185 posted on 03/30/2005 7:49:56 PM PST by Museum Twenty (Proudly supporting President George W. Bush - Proudly shouting "Rumsfeld '08!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark
So you are saying that the reason that your arguments have not been convincing is because:
"There are such hardened positions with this issue, those who are convinced the Judge is a Nazi, just out to torture innocents, are not going to be swayed by facts"

Actually, the reason that you have been unconvincing is that your arguments have not been believable. It's really that simple.

186 posted on 03/30/2005 7:49:57 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Florida: suppressio veri, suggestio falsi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
I just watched the segment on Scarborugh's show with Catherine Crier. Boy, she's a disappointment. Well, more to the point, an evil witch.

I hope we ban together and force her off the air and the best seller list.
187 posted on 03/30/2005 7:51:09 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: supercat

"Terri is dying from her original injury."

Terri is not starving because she was going to die. But she is dying because of just that lie.


188 posted on 03/30/2005 7:54:01 PM PST by SolomoninSouthDakota (Daschle is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

Have you all seen this incredible tape of Terri opening her eyes for the dr. - he keeps saying "open you eyes{ - so she finally arches her eyebrows high and her eyes wide as if to say: "Hey, how about THIS!"
It will make you laugh and then cry - SHE IS THERE - she needs therapy...THIS IS A MUST - must get it our everyone. I've sent it to all the FOX addresses, Rush, Hannity ets - but they have to get slammed with this to pay attention, so it doesn't get lost.

http://web.Tampabay.rr.com/ccb/videos/Terri_Big_Eyes.rm


189 posted on 03/30/2005 7:58:23 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL OF THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg
If they refuse to take this, they're letting stand the 11th's decision that the law is unconstitutional.

If they decline to hear it then GWB should roll. He can argue, I think properly, that this is a dispute between coequal branches of government. When the USSC declines the case, then they have abdicated their role. Bush needn't answer to a lower court on the balance of powers.

190 posted on 03/30/2005 7:58:46 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

USSC Denied the Stay


191 posted on 03/30/2005 8:00:00 PM PST by MJY1288 (The Democrats are the party for the death of the innocent and life for the wicked)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark

Would you be so kind as to list the extensive medical treatment she has received since 1999?

Are you sure that your first name isn't Jodi?


192 posted on 03/30/2005 8:06:39 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
If they decline to hear it

They have. So much for my theory, we'll see how yours plays out.

193 posted on 03/30/2005 8:07:41 PM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

I think you have found the future "Mrs. Michael Schiavo".


194 posted on 03/30/2005 8:08:45 PM PST by RasterMaster (Saddam's family were WMD's - He's behind bars & his sons are DEAD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

'dangerous' to hydrate Terri now


Oh for craps sake, what ghouls they are, I think that was the station that on of the neurologists stated that Terri was not a person. Amazing.


195 posted on 03/30/2005 8:10:39 PM PST by Gimme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
Bork said they will never hear a case on a law that is about one person, and this law was just about her. No matter what the legal or constitutional arguments. He said they just don't have time to bother.

Just another example of thinking they are better and more important than the President and Congress who did make time.
196 posted on 03/30/2005 8:14:53 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
the Schindler's didn't even get into this fight until after they asked for 1/2 of the malpractice suit $ and Mike told them no."""""

They wanted money to pay for their daughter's care -- and you call that "greed." Michael wouldn't allow it, and withheld any further rehabilitation from Terry -- and started using her trust fund to pay the death lawyer, Felos, to get a ruling that she should be killed.

197 posted on 03/30/2005 8:15:02 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia

I saw her on Scarborough and Greta (as I flip back & forth). She was vicious.

I don't know law, but I know good medical care and Terri has not been receiving that. I also know that being a pain in the ass to the nursing staff does not qualify MS as a loving spouse, in spite of what she believes. In my experience the family members who were the biggest pains in the ass were not loving family members, they were controlling family members. It is a control issue.

Crier kept invoking the names of our Founding Fathers. Funny how the Judiciary suddenly remembers "Hey, we need to use the Consitution!" What she neglected to say was that this law has been declared unconsitutional by her peers without due process. "We don't have to follow this law, it's unconstitutional!"

Scarborough is right. This is about power. This is about the courts sticking it to Congress. This is about the courts and the legislatures sticking it to the Bush brothers. Terri will die, the Judiciary has won 1 round and felos' will have his orgasmic (and I mean that literally) celebration of death at any moment.


198 posted on 03/30/2005 8:16:51 PM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Bork said they will never hear a case on a law that is about one person,

Bork is his own worst enemy.

199 posted on 03/30/2005 8:16:52 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark

First, there's no evidence that Terri had bulimia.

Second, IF she had it, she would've kept it secret as most bulimics and anorexics do, certainly from her parents and probably from even her husband.

Third, IF she had it, then she and Michael should have been responsible for her treatment, not her parents, although they probably would've happily done what they could, as they have all these years for her brain injury, (at least when they were allowed to).

As to calling Greer a Nazi, I dislike using words like "Hitler" and "Nazi" lightly, but I have to admit that this situation has some frightening similaraties to the German judges in the '30s and '40s.


200 posted on 03/30/2005 8:17:42 PM PST by skr (May God bless those in harm's way and confound those who would do the harming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 381-393 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson