Well, ordinarily, yes, because the other party can simply file for divorce. In this case,...
So your problem is with the law.
No, the legislature attempted to remedy that with a subsequent law. But, some laws are apparently better than others.
But when you blame the judges for not enforcing your moral opinion of what the law should be, but what it is, then you're mad.
It's not a moral opinion, it's the actual nature of marriage. Otherwise, it's redefining the institution.
Everyone on this forum wants to blame the judges. They too are dealt the hands they get.
So the law says that a probate judge can order the feeding tube pulled. Fine. What about the order that she cannot be fed by mouth?
She's failed three out of three swallowing tests. I wish the court had requested a more recent one.
On the other hand, I don't have any doubt that Michael could have crammed a bowl of outmeal down her mouth and ended this years ago.