Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TalBlack
Wouldn't a 5ft sword be closer to 26lbs than just 6lbs? At 5ft and only 6lbs I can't imagine it would survive very many two handed swipes.

I've got a 4' wrecking bar at work that only weighs 7 pounds. A sword with a fuller to stiffen and lighten it would easily be lighter than that. Doesn't look like the Wallace sword has a fuller though.

63 posted on 03/30/2005 3:35:31 PM PST by LexBaird ("Democracy can withstand anything but democrats" --Jubal Harshaw (RA Heinlein))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: LexBaird

"I've got a 4' wrecking bar at work that only weighs 7 pounds."

That's about what I was thinking--the stuff is HEAVY!.

The interesting thing is that I once heard on the History Channel that some swords were about 18 to 20lbs. I think they were of a later era (full body armor)than Wallace. Imagine trying to swing a 20lb sword!!??


75 posted on 03/30/2005 5:03:20 PM PST by TalBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson