Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MJemison

You are both wrong. Where do you get the idea that med. European swords are overly heavy?


38 posted on 03/30/2005 1:42:30 PM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: fishtank
I have no idea how much this sword weighs but I've seen it and it's huge. My first reaction is that it's probably taller than Mel Gibson. NOt knocken Mel but he aint to tall.

My second thought was William Wallace was alleged to be around 6'5" and even if you factor in some exageration due to legendary status he had to be one big MOFO for his time. If you see the sword you can tell he would have to be very big and strong to wield it.

45 posted on 03/30/2005 1:53:33 PM PST by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank
You are both wrong. Where do you get the idea that med. European swords are overly heavy?

Just guessing that the weapon had to have some serious heft- my apologies. Have read that the men who wielded these (successfully)were extraordinarily strong and agile, and had the stamina to do this throughout an entire battle. I have to admire that kind of physical ability.

147 posted on 03/31/2005 7:42:33 AM PST by MJemison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson