I reread your post your are an apologist for the court prompt attention.
If your interpretation of justice is prompt review of court filings then you are ignorant.
I never said that was my interpretation of justice. If it makes you feel better to lie about what I've said, have at it. It doesn't make any difference to me. If you have to misrepresent a fact to try to prove your point, you haven't proven anything. You've lost the argument.