Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thoughtomator
First, you are trying to dodge the fact that you misstated what they did. Why not just own up to it and move on?

Second, the 11th Circuit was not required to conduct a de novo review - the District Court was required to conduct a de novo review of violations of Terri's Federal constitutional rights. Unfortunately, the hyperbole spewing lawyers decided to make their TRO motion about Greer's prior actions, which necessitates that those actions in the underlying case be the basis of the review. And the Federal case, by the very terms of Terri's law, did not involve de novo review of state law issues - it dealt only with deprivation of Federal constitutional rights - for some reason, it wasn't submitted to Whittemore on that basis.

A little honesty and accuracy would go a long, long way around here these days...

405 posted on 03/30/2005 2:34:38 PM PST by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul

Read Wilson's dissent and the All Writs Act.


411 posted on 03/30/2005 2:38:22 PM PST by northernlightsII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

To: lugsoul

Okay fine, I didn't know the Circuit Court's rules and I got it wrong. Happy?

The Schindlers' lawyers SUCK.


424 posted on 03/30/2005 2:47:18 PM PST by thoughtomator (Order "Judges Gone Wild!" Only $19.95 have your credit card handy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson