Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blaquebyrd

I really believe that they did not contemplate Congress nullification. It is a very serious attack on the Constitution.What you are saying is that from now on any law of Congress should include a provision to the effect that If any judge fails to apply this law ,he will thrown in jail.


39 posted on 03/30/2005 12:31:05 PM PST by northernlightsII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: northernlightsII
"I really believe that they did not contemplate Congress nullification.

And that's why they find themselves in the position they are now--impotent.

59 posted on 03/30/2005 1:16:03 PM PST by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: northernlightsII
What you are saying is that from now on any law of Congress should include a provision to the effect that If any judge fails to apply this law ,he will thrown in jail.

You left out "And all food and water withheld from them until they have served their contempt of Congress sentence."
64 posted on 03/30/2005 1:31:35 PM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: northernlightsII

Exactly. A judge';s JOB is to apply the law, not try to make it.


71 posted on 03/31/2005 11:56:30 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson