Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

STARVATION: DAY 13 - Schiavo judges should be "held accountable"
WorldNetDaily ^ | 03-30-2005 | WorldNetDaily

Posted on 03/30/2005 11:58:34 AM PST by sergey1973

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: ex 98C MI Dude
The Congress didn't order a specific decision, what they ordered was a review of the evidence by the courts.

No, they ordered a de novo review of "any claim of a violation of any right of Theresa Marie Schiavo." The parents filed stating several claims, which were reviewed de novo and dismissed under current law. The court was not ordered to review all evidence from the beginning or start this multi-year process all over again in the federal courts.

41 posted on 03/30/2005 12:38:00 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: narby
then we'll be ruled by them, and not by our elected legislators.

Honestly, I don't want to be ruled by either one of them.

42 posted on 03/30/2005 12:39:14 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska

Google "US Constitution" click on 1st entry. Read Article 1 Section 3 Clause 6 & 7. Put this page in your favorites... Its a good presentation!


43 posted on 03/30/2005 12:39:23 PM PST by Edgerunner (Proud to be an infidel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska

I'm not sure--is there are any specific clause/ammendment in the Constitution that would say that Congress can impeach Judges ? I only know that Congress can impeach President.


44 posted on 03/30/2005 12:39:40 PM PST by sergey1973 (Russian American Political Blogger, Arm Chair Strategist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sergey1973

Read 41. Santorum's just whining for the cameras because the judgement didn't go his way. That's what happens when you leave a judgement up to the same law that has resulted in over a dozen prior judgements in Michael Schiavo's favor.


45 posted on 03/30/2005 12:42:14 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sergey1973

Impeach Whittemore, charge Greer with murder under color of law.


46 posted on 03/30/2005 12:43:22 PM PST by The_Reader_David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edgerunner
go here:

see Article 1 Section 3 Clause 6 & 7.
Separate but NOT equal...

http://www.house.gov/Constitution/Constitution.html
47 posted on 03/30/2005 12:43:34 PM PST by Edgerunner (Proud to be an infidel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sergey1973

See post 47


48 posted on 03/30/2005 12:45:10 PM PST by Edgerunner (Proud to be an infidel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: narby
I have no idea what grounds they'd use, but I'm sure they can think of something.

I don't think they can. All this complaining is just for the cameras and people who don't read decisions. Whittemore in his decision cited Senate transcripts showing without a doubt that the Senate did not intend to influence the judge's decisions in any way, leaving his discretion in issuing an injunction purely up to current law.

49 posted on 03/30/2005 12:48:36 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

There was ample evidence that her rights had been violated. They didn't consider that evidence, all they did was review the state courts findings, and determine that there was nothing to warrant overturning the decisions of the state courts. Much of the problem was the Schindler's incompetent lawyer's fault, but it does not absolve them of duty laid upon the judges by the Congress.

To echo Judge Wilson: I dissent.


50 posted on 03/30/2005 12:49:41 PM PST by ex 98C MI Dude (Our legal system is in a PVS. Time to remove it from the public feeding trough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas; Edgerunner; carl in alaska

Thanks Edgerunner for pointing to Google !

carl in alaska; Sola Veritas.

Maybe Senate can impeach judges too. Again, I'm not sure and I don't think it's ever happened before.

Clause 6: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Clause 7: Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.


51 posted on 03/30/2005 12:52:00 PM PST by sergey1973 (Russian American Political Blogger, Arm Chair Strategist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sergey1973

The Judges should be deprived of food and water also then see how fast Terri would be reconected..May God watch over her.


52 posted on 03/30/2005 1:04:22 PM PST by Fast1 (Destroy America buy Chinese goods,Shop at Wal-Mart 3/18/05 American was gone when I woke up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fast1
reconnected
53 posted on 03/30/2005 1:05:12 PM PST by Fast1 (Destroy America buy Chinese goods,Shop at Wal-Mart 3/18/05 American was gone when I woke up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni

"Didn't you get the memo? We no longer believe in separation of powers around here. The legislature now has the power to order judges to rule in a certain way, and the executive now has the power to send troops in to override a judge's decision if he doesn't like it."

Yeah, yeah, ...right. And judges now have the power to starve citizens to death for committing no crimes.


54 posted on 03/30/2005 1:06:42 PM PST by bowzer313
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ex 98C MI Dude
There was ample evidence that her rights had been violated. They didn't consider that evidence,

From what I read in the decision, Whittemore carefully considered each argument of rights violations and easily shot them down according to law. Maybe the lawyers could have done a better job, but that's not Whittemore's responsibility.

55 posted on 03/30/2005 1:11:20 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport
"Frustrating" doesn't convey what I feel.

I can relate. Excruciating is close, but then,it's nothing compared to what Terri's state must be.

56 posted on 03/30/2005 1:13:11 PM PST by the invisib1e hand ("remember, from ashes you came, to ashes you will return.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sergey1973
Maybe Senate can impeach judges too. Again, I'm not sure and I don't think it's ever happened before.

Twelve judges have been impeached by the House of Representatives. Seven have been removed by the Senate, most recently Judge Nixon in 1989.

57 posted on 03/30/2005 1:13:12 PM PST by SedVictaCatoni (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: bowzer313
And judges now have the power to starve citizens to death for committing no crimes.

Judge Greer has that power, because the Florida Legislature chose to give it to him when it enacted the PVS statute. If you don't like it, blame the Florida Legislature for writing it.

58 posted on 03/30/2005 1:14:09 PM PST by SedVictaCatoni (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: northernlightsII
"I really believe that they did not contemplate Congress nullification.

And that's why they find themselves in the position they are now--impotent.

59 posted on 03/30/2005 1:16:03 PM PST by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni

OK--thanks for the info ! Looks like it's time for judicial impeachment again.


60 posted on 03/30/2005 1:16:59 PM PST by sergey1973 (Russian American Political Blogger, Arm Chair Strategist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson