Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alan Keyes on Farah's WorldNetDaily Radioactive ("Reagan would have had the stones to save Terri")
Renew America ^ | March 30 05 | Keyes/Farah

Posted on 03/30/2005 11:20:36 AM PST by churchillbuff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-209 last
To: Arthur McGowan
Bush II and Jeb are murderers, plain and simple

As ridiculous as it gets.

201 posted on 03/30/2005 7:56:29 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
I think that Alan needs to think carefully about the limits of county and state authority. The sheriff is the highest law enforcement official in a county. In most states, even state law enforcement falls under the purview of county officials. Hence, it is entirely possible that a county official can, under Florida law, thwart the authority of a state official. And you know, I believe, as a conservative, that it's a good thing for state officials to be subservient to county officials.

The problem, dude, is that you are, in this situation, result driven in your political orientation. You would have condemned Reno's actions in 2000 because it resulted in returning a child to Cuba. Now you want heavy-handed state government action to thwart the authority of local officials. Because it would achieve the results you want. You can't have it both ways.

202 posted on 03/30/2005 8:07:35 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
There are men who fear criticism more than they fear death. Bush I seems to have been such a man. Bush II and Jeb are murderers, plain and simple, who don't understand the Constitution or their duty.

Boy you sure sound D-U-M-B.

203 posted on 03/30/2005 8:09:49 PM PST by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot
...this is sheer speculation.

We have seen Reagan stare down adversaries hugely more formidable than a small tyrant judge.

204 posted on 03/30/2005 9:35:25 PM PST by Tax Government (Put down the judicial insurrection. Contribute to FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Tax Government

The comparison to the Soviet Union is wrong. One, the Soviet Union was unpopular, and other presidents had stood up to them before, although not as much as Reagan did. Two, Bush or Bush would not be standing up to "a small ... judge." They would be challenging the entire concept that judges cannot be defied. This is a very, very deep concept in our political system. In terms of politics, it is actually harder than was standing up to the Russians. The president or governor would be accused of acting illegally. In the eyes of at least half the country, they would have done just that. That half of the country would be wrong, but the political fallout would be enormous. I agree that sooner or later, preferably sooner, this does need to happen. But don't assume that Reagan would have done it. The fact is, he never did.


205 posted on 03/30/2005 10:18:41 PM PST by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: California Patriot
They would be challenging the entire concept that judges cannot be defied. This is a very, very deep concept in our political system.

Judges are not the executive branch. They do not order the executive branch around. People who believe otherwise are enabling the judicary to stage a takeover of elected government.

Jeb is trash. He has NOT stood up for principle when he had a chance. Reagan would have had the stones to do the right thing.

206 posted on 03/30/2005 10:24:53 PM PST by Tax Government (Put down the judicial insurrection. Contribute to FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Tax Government

Yeah, whatever.


207 posted on 03/30/2005 10:48:53 PM PST by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Yes, it's called shooting the messenger.

When you don't have the facts, argue the law. When you don't have the law, argue the facts. When you don't have the facts or the law, pound the table.

No one ever argues Keyes points. Usually they attack him. That tells me something.

208 posted on 03/31/2005 6:03:04 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1373979/posts?page=193#193

Talk about a keeper. ROFL!

209 posted on 03/31/2005 2:39:55 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-209 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson