"he complaint addresses the issue that if indeed she did make any statement to Michael Schiavo prior to her accident in 1990, it must be made clear that prior to 2000, a feeding tube was not legally considered artificial means due to process and language. Therefore, she did not have informed consent that she could not/did not have an understanding that the determination of artificial means would include a feeding tube after the year of 2000, the complaint says. Her inability to be appropriately informed and her lack of decision making capacity combined with her inability to divorce her husband due to her incapacitation has placed her in a situation where she is being discriminated against by the courts due to her condition, the federal complaint charges. That brief is so good I think I need a cigarette ;)"
HEY, I THINK THIS APPROACH BEATS THAT ONE WE HAD WHERE WE PETITIONED THE APOSTOLIC NUNCIO TO MAKE TERRI A STAFF MEMBER TO GET DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY!!! BUT I DID MAKE THE APPEAL ANYWHOO.