Dear Dominick,
To me, the best explanation is usually the simplest.
This particular case exposes significant divisions within the conservative movement. I'm unsure that the Democrats actually had to do much at all for all this to come about.
Do I hold the lamestream media for their usual piss-poor lying accounts? Certainly. But I don't think that conspiracy is required to explain their actions. They just do what lamestream media do - they lie. And they lie in herds, because most of them are not the brightest bulbs in the box. No need to conspire.
And, if I were someone in the DNC, I'd likely tell all my folks, "Keep your hands out of this!" except to offer digs here and there in the lamestream media when called on to offer up commentary. Why? Because my enemies are knifing each other while I get to watch. I may sell tickets, but I'm CERTAINLY not going to get involved in any significant way.
Because if the camera accidentally catches me offering a sharper knife to one side or the other saying, "Here, try this one," then I'll lose all the gains I'd heretofore made.
"'The Bush boys come in a far distant fourth. They are not the principal murderers. They are merely holding the coats of those doing the murdering.'"
Anyway, I don't see that even if this WERE orchestrated, it makes it any less true that the Bush boys have not exerted their legitimate executive power and authority to prevent the murder of an innocent woman.
sitetest