Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Iam1ru1-2

Why is it that bioethicists rarely have any ethics?


3 posted on 03/29/2005 8:11:44 PM PST by Hoodlum91
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hoodlum91
Why is it that bioethicists rarely have any ethics?

Which requires more education: determining that a Bouguereau painting is more beautiful than a Polluck painting, or deterining that a Polluck painting is more beautiful than a Bouguereau?

The former requires no education. The latter requires a lot of "education" to destroy the good artistic sense that people are naturally born with.

Bioethics is the antithesis of ethics for the same reason.

4 posted on 03/30/2005 12:00:17 AM PST by supercat ("Though her life has been sold for corrupt men's gold, she refuses to give up the ghost.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Hoodlum91

You asked the million dollar question.


8 posted on 04/07/2005 3:16:50 PM PDT by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Hoodlum91

the have "ethics" but no morals.


18 posted on 04/07/2005 6:34:59 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson