Posted on 03/29/2005 6:26:35 PM PST by SmithL
This is unbelievable. Government has no business in this sort of matter. And this law also seems to discriminate against straight people, if I am reading it correctly.
We have some screwed up laws in this state. But then so does every state.
Okay let's see if the liberal federalists decide the federal courts should butt out of this one. Oh, and by the way, Florida has a similar law. Michael Shiavo should be immediately arrested.
I think it's a dumb law, but should be a state's rights issue.
We may decry -- in fact, I often do -- the continued erosion in moral standards. But whether we like it or not, the law needs to reflect, at least to some extent, contemporary attitudes. It may have been considered shacking up in the 1950s, but it's utterly mainstream behavior today.
Perhaps we should bring back the dunking stool, scarlet letters, and prosecution of women for being scolds.
It makes you a classical "liberal", circa 1900. Today this attitude would be considered libertarian.
If you believe in the at-will principle regarding employment, the boss was completely in his rights.
I would think they could throw a lot of people from the universitys in jail or a fine whatever the penalty. I know several people at my school who live in mixed gender houses. In some cases they are platonic relationships but people need roommates. I have to wonder what would happen if there are co-ed dorms.
That is exactly how I read it as well.
If only they made a MOAB for egos.
What if she was living with this man and he had two children with her? Would she get the tax break for being a single mother? And what often happens with this "living together" nonesense? You have two people living together for years, sometimes one person has children from another man.
Aren't there laws defining a "commonlaw" marriage as two unrelated, opposite sex adults living together for a specified period of time? If I remember correctly, under NC Law, you are legally married if you have been cohabitating for more than 6 months. I could be completely wrong however.
There are good reasons for bringing back the scarlet letter. By engaging in sex with someone who is married you risk bringing into the world a child who will not have the possibility of having a father. Especially if that father has children with his spouse. The problem becomes one of punishing the wrongdoers without harming the innocent children. Not an easy task. Marriage, though, is a contract and the State is a party and the purpose of which is to provide for the rights and welfare of the children produced. If that contract is violated, civil penalties should be imposed. The harm done to citizens by children of broken households (the jails are full of them) raises the question of whether criminal punishments should follow as well.
If cohabitation results in children, the parents should be considered married by "common law" as well.
Yes and it means automatic membership in the ACLU for you.There's no getting out of it - you're IN now.
Perhaps we should bring back the dunking stool, scarlet letters, and prosecution of women for being scolds.
I oughtta give you a good scolding for that.
(Just having fun) Holly
I lived platonically for 6 years with a female roommate while we each saved money to buy our individual houses. No one gave birth.
There doesn't appear to be any common-law provisions in NC state law. One would assume that with a law like this on the books, one wouldn't be needed.
Pedophelia is next on the agenda....and you will be labeled a "pedophobe" if you oppose it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.