Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ContraryMary

=== Michael had nothing to do with it.

Absolutely he had something to do with it. It was under his orders that she was barred from taking food or drink by mouth and restricted solely to the tube for feeding.

Get your facts straight. None of this had to happen. In fact, if Michael still stood by his sworn testimony and that of his hired guns in the malpractice suit instead of opting to kill her based on belatedly recalled hearsay, there would be no question of Terri's being a burden.

For all we know, she might have been eating solid food and forming actual words by now had her husband not elected to shut her in a closet and use her rehab funds on finding an attorney who'd win his right to starve her to death.


154 posted on 03/29/2005 6:54:58 PM PST by Askel5 († Cooperatio voluntaria ad suicidium est legi morali contraria. †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: Askel5
Then you didn't read my post. I said Michael had nothing to do, as you claimed, with the feeding tube being inserted.
155 posted on 03/29/2005 6:56:55 PM PST by ContraryMary (WPPFF Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson