Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius Valerius
So what section 2 must mean is that due process is required before violating the rights of life and liberty, and Terri has gotten due process, at least according to the state of Florida.

B.S.

'Due process' refers to a trial for a charged criminal, not what Terri has gone through, sans any legal representation of her own.

168 posted on 03/29/2005 12:01:23 PM PST by EternalVigilance ("I thirst.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance
'Due process' refers to a trial for a charged criminal

No it doesn't--specifically when it concerns property. If the government is taking away a property right of mine, it is required to give me due process, and I'm certainly not a charged criminal. Due process definitely extends well beyond the world of criminal law.

224 posted on 03/29/2005 12:25:28 PM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

"due process"

All court actions are based on "due process" - in other words did the lawyers use the right laws and was the right process followed in the court procedures.

Due process is for any COURT trial - and not just for criminals. Terri was not required to have legal representation because she WAS MARRIED and her husband was representing her.

Why can't you look up the correct information before misleading people with your erroneous statements about "due process".


330 posted on 03/29/2005 1:58:44 PM PST by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson