[tallhappy]

The decision was that the government directed it, not Michael Schiavo.

You support the government making that life and death decision.

I see you don't really have intellectual honesty or integrity. You do acknowledge the right of the government and acquiesce to the power of the state to make decisions in a personal life.

[billbears]

The decision was that the government directed it, not Michael Schiavo

Perhaps you haven't read the decision from the court? What am I saying? Of course you haven't. The judge was asked to review a law that clearly stated what was to be done. He reviewed it and apparently didn't disagree with it. That wasn't 'government directed' no matter how much you faux conservatives wish it to be. That was upholding a current law. That's what courts tend to do within our system of government.

You support the government making that life and death decision.

Hey I'm not the one advocating taking the power out of the hands of the government and handing it over to a group of political hacks, most of whom don't have medical degrees, that know better than us all apparently

I see you don't really have intellectual honesty or integrity. You do acknowledge the right of the government and acquiesce to the power of the state to make decisions in a personal life.

Yep that's me. Dishonest and full of it. For allowing the guardian, no matter how much I think he may be a total sh*t, for making the decision of when or when not to disconnect the tube instead of the 435 'wise men' in Washington DC