[cdbull23]

I don't know WHERE this case plays in..."right to die" / "right to live" -- it DEFINITELY does make a difference, and I, like the rest of us, cannot say what she would have wanted.

I'm confused though. If someone has the right to life and liberty, etc.,are they therefore not allowed to waive those rights? And thus...have the right to die (again, assuming that is what she would have wanted) just as much as they have the right to live?

Just wondering.

[monkeywrench]

Not on the heresay of a philandering husband.