[seams2me]

I support your views on the subject, except that "shacking up" is not what made him wrong. It is fundamentally wrong to starve her. It would also be fundamentally wrong to keep her alive against her will, if her will could be determined.

[Kings18-37]

Seams, we seem to be in substantial agreement, so no quibbling.

To me, in this instance, when he choose a new woman, he gave up his right to dictate Terri's life. But that's just my moral code, I don't push that on anyone else.

But, all that aside, he definitely should not be the one whose testimony has deprived her of good and drink.

As to Terri's choice, if she had a living will- certainly that's up to her.

Cheers