good for you.....insults are the way to go to influence people.......very good democratic tactic.....and there were mutiple decisions.....if most pundits realize this and the Bush's (called cowards by some) do, I have to trust in them to some extent......how did you feel when "judges" spanked Mayor Newsome for marrying gays because of his "moral" convictions.....you most likely didn't write in to chastise those idiot judges for upholding the law did you????
I responded to your post telling me I was off topic when i indeed addressed your point.
Appellate systems were put in place because there was a recognition very early on that judges make mistakes, very often and ver blatantly.
If you want to read about miscarriages of justice where the errors went all the way to the highest court, read about the Dred Scott case (Dred Scott vs Sanford).It eventually led to the civil war.
I don't listen to the pundits especially those parading on the MSM.
Your comment about Bush is irrelevant to me,as I have not taken a position about the legalities of his taking action.
It would appear that legal experts generally think that his powers are very limited.
That said it does not change his moral dilemma.