Some of my responses have been split in two, but my responses have been in response to things you wrote.
Further down, you made the all-present if-then statement about murder.
I have stated my reasons for believing that the diagnosis of PVS was not done in credible fashion. I have asked for you to either challenge specific assertions with which you disagree, or provide evidence of incurable PVS which would be credible even if my assertions were true. If there is legitimate basis for declaring Terri to be PVS, you should be able to do one or other of these things.
Of course, it'll probably be easier for you to just ignore the question of whether the PVS diagnosis was railroaded and instead harp on about how unfair it is for others to butt in, ignoring the fact that if the assertions are true there is every reason to butt in. But say what you will--I'm sure lurkers will figure it out.
Actually, lurkers will read all of my posts and recognize that I'm refusing to be baited by an argument that doesn't go anywhere. As I have repeatedly stated, all I can opine in this case is based on my wishes - and short of incontrovertable proof of wrongdoing, MO is that people should butt out. It's not your place, it's not mine, and it sure as heck shouldn't be the political circus it's become.
Sorry to spoil your last word party.