The parents perceived, quite rightly IMHO, that Michael was trying to sandbag Terri's condition and use that as justification for killing her. I see no reason to give any credence whatsoever to the Schiavos' claims about Terri's wishes. They conveniently made up stories of different mettings with Terri, so there would be no need to worry about people keeping each other's stories straight. They further attributed to Terri an unbelievable level of foresight (who else would have predicted that the legislature would in 1999 change "life support" to include food and water?)
Michael, Felos, and Greer all have clear craven motives for killing Terri. How anyone can find them credible when their actions clearly indicate that they have for years tried to prevent any possibility of Terri getting better is beyond me.
What possible motive could the judge have for "killing" Terri.
How can anyone find them credible you ask? That is probably the funniest thing about the 'cool, rational, thinking, logical, blah, blah, blah' pro-death people. They believe every word of proven, pathological liars and then want others to respect them.
You're right - it is only your opinion.
None of the speculation about MS has been proven - which is supposed to be how it works. Instead, those who don't agree are showing him the same amount of consideration as they are showing their fellow posters here.
But that's not really here nor there, as I haven't offered any opinion other than those stated in my original post.
You see, I only speak to what I know for sure, and don't join in with additional hysterical/unproven statements.