| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 03/28/2005 2:08:51 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
Please comment here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1371671/posts |
Posted on 03/28/2005 2:00:22 PM PST by BillCompton
As to arguments about ''Congressional overreaching'' and ''states' rights,'' which is more likely? That Congress will use this precedent to pass bills keeping you -- yes, you, Joe Schmoe of 37 Elm Street -- alive till your 118th birthday. Or that the various third parties who intrude between patient and doctor in the American system -- next of kin, HMOs, insurers -- will see the Schiavo case as an important benchmark in what's already a drift toward a culture of convenience euthanasia. Here's a thought: Where do you go to get a living-will kit saying that in the event of a hideous accident I don't want to be put to death by a Florida judge or the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals? And, if you had such a living will, would any U.S. court recognize it?
(Excerpt) Read more at suntimes.com ...
Previously, people could be forgiven for thinking that in the absence of such a document it would be assumed that one didn't want to be put to death.
You might want to look at a Protective Medical Decisions Document (includes a Protective ID card):
http://www.internationaltaskforce.org/pmdd.htm
Or the Will To Live:
http://www.nrlc.org/euthanasia/willtolive/index.html
The only reason a Living Will is considered legal is because the pro-euthanasia groups, which originated Living Wills, persuaded state legislators to make them legal.
More on Living Wills and pro-euthanasia groups here:
http://prolife.ath.cx:8000/plae111.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.