Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billbears
Either way, the family would be making the decision. In fact, the decision to keep her fed would be supported by people who are more "family" than the adulterous husband who wants her to die.
54 posted on 03/28/2005 12:31:18 PM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
Either way, the family would be making the decision. In fact, the decision to keep her fed would be supported by people who are more "family" than the adulterous husband who wants her to die.

Not necessarily. As it is now, that would be a definite possibility. But as with every other power the national government has taken upon itself, this power would also logically be expanded. If this power were given to the national government, I could easily see a politician sponsoring a bill one day defining the point between life and death. And because Republicans condoned the first positive action preventing a family from carrying out questionable instructions, they wouldn't have a leg to stand on in the argument

No, no matter how despicable the husband may be, I feel safer for myself and my family if the national government does not get involved again

65 posted on 03/28/2005 12:47:26 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson