Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MWS
Had they done so, there is the likelihood that the local police (who, from what I understand, do not answer to the governor's office) might not have backed down.

So instead the Governor backed down ceding the traditional (and Constitutional) role of the Executive Branch as enforcer of law to a defiant judge whose role as an officer of the court is adjudication of the law. Nice!

64 posted on 03/28/2005 7:57:12 AM PST by TigersEye (Are your parents Pro-Choice? I guess you got lucky! ... Is your spouse?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

It is either that or act and do considerable harm to the political status of Republicans across the country.

Sadly, reality and politics do not always pay attention to constitutional roles, as much as we might like. Regardless of whether it would have been the governor's right to take such an action, liberals would have an opening to say that he went beyond his rights and duties, and the average man in the streets, who knows no better and believes everything is great unless someone is taking drastic action, will believe them.

And then we would be in a position where we could not get anything we want on our agenda done, because Democrats would be in control. Perception is everything.


78 posted on 03/28/2005 8:03:46 AM PST by MWS (Errare humanum est, in errore perservare stultum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson