Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mountaineer

It shouldn't hinge on whether one can speak. If the wishes are clear, they're clear. If not, the mistake should be made on allowing another full review of the facts. Hopefully there are not three people in my life or history that would sign affidavits saying I wanted something I did not want (oh, and signing those affidavits years after the fact). There are plenty who cannot speak, so,,,they die?


26 posted on 03/28/2005 7:37:16 AM PST by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: austinaero
Your post makes no sense. You tried to compare Reeve and Schiavo, as both lacked the ability to feed themselves. The difference is significant. After his injury, Reeve still could speak. He suffered no brain damage, and could have told his spouse whether he wanted to be fed or have the respirator continued.

The issue, certainly, is whether Terri ever expressed her wishes prior to her injury, but that has nothing to do with Christopher Reeve's type of injury and there's no analogy.

You said, "If the wishes are clear, they're clear," and that's exactly how the cases differ. His were, hers weren't, and that's how the courts got involved.

37 posted on 03/28/2005 7:41:54 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson