he believes it will show the public the full and massive extent of damage to her braine through her cardiac arrest in 1990. Dr. John Thogmartin, certified for this purpose will be doing this."
Dr. Thogmartin is not 'certified for this purpose' which the purpose stated in the preceding sentence is,,, 'show the public the full and massive extent of damage to her braine through her cardiac arrest in 1990.'
He is a medical examiner and his PURPOSE is to see if there is any allegations to claims Terri's accident was caused by abuse and criminal charges can be filed.
He is not there to make a judgment on whether or not she is braindead, EVEN THOUGH THAT IS WHAT YOU WANT, and WHAT THOSE WHO WANT TERRI DEAD,DEAD,DEAD, want to be able to live with themselves.
So your 'proof' is an excerpt of a posted article, which the substantive arguments contained within are falsehoods, or at the very least, non-relatable points given to a reading audience with the attention span of a young child, and less retained education.
You mentioned that you have supplied documentation before, and that I acknowledge.
You mentioned that I had made a mistake and you corrected me.
I admitted my mistake and accepted and Thank'ed you for you doing so.
Have you ever made a mistake?
Is it possible that Michael is an attempted Murderer, getting away with it because of the entanglement of a LAWYER and JUDGE who find it possible to alter the laws to line their pockets?