The paper reports that Ms. Lane's lawyer refused to comment on whether Michelle Lane played a role in exposing Freeper NCPAC (Steffen's) rumormongering. I thought the lawyer denied she was MD4Bush. Did she give information to Clements? Is Clements MD4Bush? Why hasn't the MSM asked if he is?
MD4Bush Ping!
(FReepmail me if you want on or off the list)
By rumormongering, I mean commenting on rumors posted here. That's all we know NCPAC did. Even the Washington Post admitted that there's no evidence NCPAC did anything more to spread the rumors here or elsewhere.
Well this sure does keep getting interesting
EXCERPT
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A5681-2005Mar27.html
Editorial
Mr. Ehrlich's Distractions
Monday, March 28, 2005; Page A16
AS HUNDREDS of pieces of legislation head into the crucial home stretch of the Maryland General Assembly's 2005 session, one might think Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (R) would be busy fighting for bills he likes and against those he doesn't. Instead, he is engaged in scandal damage control. That's the impression the governor gave when he suggested to reporters that he is the victim, first, of an "orchestrated" Democratic campaign to leak embarrassing material about his Republican administration, and, second, of a former aide who he says tried to "blackmail" him. His extraordinary remarks reinforced the impression of an administration that veers from one bizarre gambit to the next, without much attention to the major debates facing the state.
(snip)