Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nmh

They were never legally entitled to see her medical records. That's why. All that privacy business. You know? Mommy and Daddy weren't her guardians. Mrs. Schiavo was "Mrs. SCHIAVO", not "Miss SCHINDLER".

Michael Schiavo may be a piece of garbage, but that's not the issue. The issue is "Who was legally Mrs. Schiavo's guardian?" and the answer isn't "Mom and Dad".

Life's tough. Wear a helmet.


114 posted on 03/28/2005 9:40:24 PM PST by libertarianben (Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: libertarianben
"The issue is "Who was legally Mrs. Schiavo's guardian?"

And I suppose you think the proper guardian of Mrs. Schiavo is the common-law husband of JODI CONSTANZE?

There are laws against bigamy, even in Florida. Does "alienation of affection" ring any bells?

134 posted on 03/28/2005 11:26:32 PM PST by cookcounty (Michael Schiavo is a bigamist. When he chose Jodi, he should have lost rights over Teri.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

To: libertarianben

I understand that. I have no issue with that.

What I don't agree with is the conflict of interest of Michael as her "legal guardian". He was biased.


140 posted on 03/29/2005 7:34:46 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson