Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stormcrow
If the "law" said that Restorer was to be tied to a tree, doused with gasoline and set on fire, would you expect everyone to stand back placidly and watch?

The "law" doesn't say that, so your argument is purely hypothetical.

All I'm saying is that one cannot denounce judges for legislating from the bench to allow homosexual marriage, and simultaneously denounce them for following the law with regard to Teri Schiavo and not legislating from the bench to prevent the law as it presently stands from being carried out.

Don't get me wrong. I'm all in favor of making some significant changes in these laws.

74 posted on 03/27/2005 6:49:06 AM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Restorer
"your argument is purely hypothetical"

Thank you, Captain Obvious, for pointing out what was already specifically implicit.

And when they write the law to burn (or starve or shoot) Restorer to death, don't come crying to me please.

79 posted on 03/27/2005 6:55:56 AM PST by Stormcrow ("It's not that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so much that isn't so.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson