""The patients are in charge of the asylum," Harvey said. "The people who hired him with tenure and gave him his chairmanship will decide if he should be fired for a lack of performance."
Yep........and the gargoyles have taken over the cathedrals in America, too.
1 posted on
03/26/2005 9:18:55 PM PST by
CHARLITE
To: CHARLITE
No conservative alumni should contribute to CU. Hit them where they really feel it.
2 posted on
03/26/2005 9:26:12 PM PST by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Florida: suppressio veri, suggestio falsi)
To: CHARLITE
Employers should seriously question the value of a CU degree.
3 posted on
03/26/2005 9:35:32 PM PST by
Buck W.
(Yesterday's Intelligentsia are today's Irrelevantsia.)
To: CHARLITE
There is a distinction, Rosse said, between supporting Churchill's freedom of speech and deciding whether he stole or misrepresented other people's work. The faculty who took out the ad demanded a complete cessation of the investigation into Churchill--all allegations, on grounds that it was politically motivated. So any committee member who signed the ad clearly has a conflict of interest because he has already taken a position and put up his own funds to publicize it.
To: CHARLITE
I don't understand why they are having such a hard time firing this guy.
Whenever I take a job, I sign an agreement that says in effect that "if I am found to have given false information in order to get this position," it is "grounds for dismissal."
You'd think that a university would have brains enough to make their hirees sign such documents as a condition of employment.
Seems like UC was more concerned about PC than AC (academic creditials).
6 posted on
03/26/2005 9:59:37 PM PST by
wai-ming
To: CHARLITE
8 posted on
03/27/2005 1:18:31 AM PST by
Stormcrow
("It's not that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so much that isn't so.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson