To: Jacquerie
Perhaps not. Neither would a newborn baby. Kill 'em both, right?And not only that, but kill them in a very torturous manner. No humane quick painless morphine cocktail, instead they want to let them slowly starve and dehydrate over a 10-day period. That's because they're so *compassionate* and *caring*.
To: Numbers Guy
instead they want to let them slowly starve and dehydrate over a 10-day period. That's because they're so *compassionate* and *caring*.
Don't forget, you also have to show up every day like Michael so you can gloat.
78 posted on
03/26/2005 5:00:12 PM PST by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: Numbers Guy
And not only that, but kill them in a very torturous manner. No humane quick painless morphine cocktail, instead they want to let them slowly starve and dehydrate over a 10-day period. That's because they're so *compassionate* and *caring*.It took my cousin three and a half weeks to die when her feeding tube was removed. She looked like the picture posted above. It was horrid.
To: Numbers Guy
Ancient Rome used to abandon unwanted newborns on the mountainside. At birth, the baby was presented to its father for approval. If Daddy didn't like the kid's looks (disabled, female, whatever), he could order the child to be abandoned. His word was law. If he didn't want to provide for the kid, that was it.
193 posted on
03/26/2005 5:45:55 PM PST by
Ciexyz
(Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.d)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson