Are you asserting that her cerebral cortex was removed? Of course she has a cerebral cortex, and no one on earth, not Judge Greer, not Michael Schaivo, not her parents, not you, not me, knows whether there is any significant activity in it, thanks to the wickedness of MS, the complicity of Greer, the refusal of higher courts to act (gee they can make up law to allow abortion, to say that forbidding advertisements mentioning a candidate's name isn't a 'law abridging the freedom of the press', but not to save a woman's life), and the spineless refusal by Jeb Bush to force a constitutional crisis.
I am a non-religious conservative so apparently I am immune from the mass self-deception that is being induced on this issue.
What I now see is that people have become emotionally attached to this issue, not because they want to save terri, but because they hate this michael and greer guy so much that they WANT terri to be concious just so they can prosecute these guys. Forget that all the evidence supports the lower court rulings, people are simply believing what they want to believe. Go - look on the internet and find the opinion of bloggers who have studied neurology and conclude that there is no point in doing and MRI because the CAT scans show so much damage.
All the other side really has is this video and experts who largely quote the video as their evidence. I've seen the video, and most distributers fail to mention it is selectively clipped from a longer *4 1/2 hour video*. Also that the behaviour seen such as laughter, blinking is typical of pvs (from what I have read)
The refusal of the higher courts to act? Good! As far as I know there have been no laws broken so there is no reason for higher courts to get involved in local issues.