Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thinkingman129
"Unfortunately she (purposely?) left out the basis for the malpractice suit (which must have been affirmed, since there was indeed a hefty award to MS). "

malpractice awards do not have to have any merit. The jury is not 12 medical experts, but 12 civilians not smart enough to get off the jury of educated enough to be thrown off. Often juries give hefty awards because of slick-meister lawyers and sad cases that may or may not have anything to do with real malpractice. Unfortunately too often juries are incapable of understanding the medical science to make intelligent verdicts-think OJ
55 posted on 03/26/2005 2:03:25 PM PST by avile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: avile
The jury is not 12 medical experts, but 12 civilians not smart enough to get off the jury

Hear, hear!

80 posted on 03/26/2005 2:35:39 PM PST by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: avile

You are certain there was a jury? I don't remember reading about a jury. But that's a moot point.

The point is that the Schindlers were complicit with Michael Schindler in the case which was filed as a malpractice hinging on doctors' inadequate care and diagnosis of bulimia.


106 posted on 03/26/2005 3:24:17 PM PST by thinkingman129 (questioning clears the way to understanding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson