[TruthSetsUFree]

"The federal judge here in Tampa who was first to hear the case is a Clinton appointee. He is the one who chose to simply ignore the law that Congress had passed and treat the case like any other appeal, not like the new case that Congress had intended. And of course, he's perfectly within his rights to do so since Congress, probably in an attempt to be 'gentlemanly' used the word 'may' instead of the word shall and he conveniently decided that may also gave him the choice of 'may no' and that was his path. Legally according to the letter of the law. All nice and neat."

Unfortunately it's all too nice and neat, as you say. It's difficult for me to wrap my mind around how all this could happen.

[easonc52]

Unfortunately it's all too nice and neat, as you say. It's difficult for me to wrap my mind around how all this could happen.

There's no way a rational mind could wrap around what's happening.

[jwpjr]

re: it's all too nice and neat

You would think that in 10 plus years at least ONE decision would go for the family, or the judge would have told the husband 'no', but that just doesn't seem to be the case. I cannot recall a single ruling in the family's favor. Something really stinks about all this. I fear we will never know though because any investigative reporter that might take a good hard look is probably MSM and biased against the family anyway.