Well past time. Should have been thought of shortly after Marbury v. Madison.
To rectify this situation, and to prevent federal courts from legislating as opposed to interpreting, Amendment XVIII should be added to our Constitution which says exactly what you wrote:
"The Supreme Court shall find no law".
Where would I be wrong?
453 rdb3
______________________________________
Should have been thought of shortly after Marbury v. Madison.
2 WinOne4TheGipper
You would be wrong in thinking that our Constitution allows federal courts to legislate 'law', as opposed to interpreting whether the law in question is itself Constitutional.
Marbury made clear that the USSC is just as bound to support the principles of the Constitution as Legislators. - Or the Executive.
Nothing has changed since 1803 except our political system, - and the men in that system who dishonor their oaths to support the Constitution.
In Marbury vs Madison Jefferson Saw the Beginning of Judicial Tyranny
Address:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1368285/posts