Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Destro
The federal courts were supposed to look at it de novo. I don't see how keeping Terri alive a few more years would have harmed any one. People would have come away with a sense the courts protected every one's rights. Today people feel loathing and rage at the courts for disregarding long-settled precepts of elementary justice.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
29 posted on 03/26/2005 1:55:17 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop

The federal courts DID look at it "de novo". They performed a de novo review of the law.

That being said, they did not perform a de novo trial. A new trial would be almost unheard of -- including death penalty cases. The only time I can think of a de novo trial is in the case of an appeal of a small claims court ruling.

The law said "de novo" but never specified which type.


294 posted on 03/26/2005 5:26:00 AM PST by sgent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson