No it wouldn't be, don't let him fool you with his slick talk. If the doc says there are some visible signs or absence thereof showing PVS or dorkheadedness or whatever diagnosis, then the doc can show the judge, the judge doesn't just have to take the doc's word for it.
No I'm not fooled. I asked the question precisely because of the outlandishness of his belief as to why he thinks the judge should not go to see Terri with his own two eyes.