I've shown him that. He just comes back with "it's survived judicial review 12 times" or something similiar. I'm paraphrasing here.
From what I'm hearing, the courts haven't acted in good faith toward Terri Schiavo.
A simple solution to the issue would be for the courts to take temporary custody of Terri, and then order a full medical examination, including tests previously denied by the husband (the previous guardian).
Once completed, the court can invite the testimony of multiple experts to interpret the results of the tests, and then make a fully informed decision.
As best as I can tell, the tests so far done would suffice for a guesstimate diagnosis, or a working diagnosis, but to decide the life or death, a guesstimate is not good enough. In such a case, the court should require that it be convinced beyond the shadow of a doubt, before it could then condemn a patient to death. And if such is the decision of the court, no pussy-footing around the issue by "letting" someone die. If we're going to kill someone, we might as well do the job ourselves, rather than starve them to death. Lethal injection, and may God have mercy on those who advocated the killing of an innocent.