Skip to comments.
Why Schiavo's Parents Didn't Have a Case
latimes.com ^
| March 25, 2005
| Andrew Cohen
Posted on 03/26/2005 1:34:45 AM PST by Destro
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 361-375 next last
To: Destro
their principles like not to kill the innocent should supercede the principle of state rights.Whatever that is.
I thaught that really the whole state vs federal rights was just a device used to protect the individuals in the states.
It would be crazy to sacrifice the individual to save the device.
To: Destro
"If such a motion was put forth it has been rejected. Case closed for that avenue."
And you know for a fact this was done because???
122
posted on
03/26/2005 2:58:09 AM PST
by
txradioguy
(Freedom Of Speech Makes It Much Easier To Spot The Idiots)
To: Destro
You're so eager to dance on a grave that you don't even know there is a body in. Tells on your character.
To: txradioguy
"The lawyers could wasily argue that since Mr. Schiavo has been living in an adluterous relationship and fathering children out of wedlock he has violated the Florida laws concerning marriage and adultery and therefore has relinquished his right to claim guardianship."
You must be joking. Anti-family activists in both political parties have been working hard for 150 years (and more intensely for 35 years) to legitimize and popularize adultery. Do women with children from adulterous "soul communions" and "affairs of the heart" lose guardianship of their children as a result of adultery, even though adultery is harmful to children?
The chickens are coming home to roost on the Schiavo issue, just as they did on the "same-sex marriage" issue. Destroy the family, and everyone else's rights follow out the window, sooner or later.
124
posted on
03/26/2005 2:59:10 AM PST
by
familyop
(Essayons!)
To: Destro
Separation of powers also means that the executive branch is not bound by the rulings of the judicial branch.
To: Destro
The legislature is barred from ruling on laws they pass - called seperation of powers. Civics 101. Not when it comes to an impeachment proceeding.
To: txradioguy
No, I don't call the Schindler's and suggest it quick!
127
posted on
03/26/2005 3:00:47 AM PST
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: familyop
"You must be joking?"
Ummm no I wasn't.
128
posted on
03/26/2005 3:01:00 AM PST
by
txradioguy
(Freedom Of Speech Makes It Much Easier To Spot The Idiots)
To: Truthsearcher
Yes! Because the only recourse against a misbehaving executive is impeachment. Which the LEGISLATURE does. Not a court.
To: HiTech RedNeck
There is a body in where?
130
posted on
03/26/2005 3:01:45 AM PST
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: txradioguy
"If we want to go the conflict of interest path...then lets not forget that Felos donated to Judge Greer's last election campaign and is on the board of directors for the Hospice where Michael is keeping Terri."
I had no idea. I would say the man in Black has a severe conflict of interest. Why has no one brought this up before?
Why has Terri been kept in Hospice Care for 5 years? Hospice is for end of life care for the dying, not for rehab and care for the disabled.
131
posted on
03/26/2005 3:02:28 AM PST
by
PJBlogger
(BEWARE :: HILLARY and her HINO want to take back YOUR COUNTRY !)
To: Destro
"No, I don't call the Schindler's and suggest it quick!"
You know it's answers like this and your holier-than-thou attitude that makes it REALLY hard to keep going in a civil manner with you on this debate.
132
posted on
03/26/2005 3:02:48 AM PST
by
txradioguy
(Freedom Of Speech Makes It Much Easier To Spot The Idiots)
To: Truthsearcher
Separation of powers also means that the executive branch is not bound by the rulings of the judicial branch. Yes it does - checks and balances - sheesh.
133
posted on
03/26/2005 3:03:30 AM PST
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: PJBlogger
Search the FR discussion links. I think that's where I saw them at today.
134
posted on
03/26/2005 3:03:43 AM PST
by
txradioguy
(Freedom Of Speech Makes It Much Easier To Spot The Idiots)
To: Destro; Nick Danger
You're dancing in glee about something that could be a non issue.
We disagree with the lead article, if you happen to notice. The Schindlers' attorneys have muffed it.
To: Destro
Horsehooki. You don't call it a "court case" what amounts to kiilling witnesses.
136
posted on
03/26/2005 3:04:59 AM PST
by
JudgemAll
(Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
To: txradioguy
Happens when I have to repeat myself.
137
posted on
03/26/2005 3:05:49 AM PST
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
To: Destro
But the courts were NEVER designed to hold more power over the law than the other two branches. Which is the case this country today.
The checks and balances are being trumped by the false notion that every thing is subject to judicial review.
138
posted on
03/26/2005 3:06:17 AM PST
by
txradioguy
(Freedom Of Speech Makes It Much Easier To Spot The Idiots)
To: Destro
What are the checks and balances on the judicial branch of government these days?
139
posted on
03/26/2005 3:06:21 AM PST
by
Modok
To: Destro
You're going to fall off that Clydesdale and bash your head in some day.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 361-375 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson