Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snarkytart
The point is he did not even try to help protect this woman.

How do you know that? Maybe he tried to come up with an argument that would support her restraining order but she just didn't present legally sufficient evidence.

You do not seem to understand that not much is needed for a restraining order.

That depends on whether it is a TRO (temporary restrainig order), preliminary injunction, or permanent injunction. It's very presumptious to assert that the judge did nothing to try to help the estranged wife in question without examining the record in the case. You seem to be judging Greer without carefully examining the facts while at the same time criticizing him for doing so.

17 posted on 03/26/2005 12:15:57 AM PST by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: ravinson

AH yet Greer granted none of what you mentioned. Even the lowest standard of proof is needed for TRO.
I could get one with no other proof other than a police report.




23 posted on 03/26/2005 12:49:54 AM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: ravinson
An ethical jurist would have recused himself from this case!
27 posted on 03/26/2005 2:10:24 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (When you compromise with evil, evil wins. AYN RAND)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson