Did he "ignore"that evidence or did he properly find that that evidence was not credible?
How could he find it not credible when he never even entered it into the record as "not credible".
I've read several reports that say none of the nurses statements were ever entered into the records of the case.
That tells me Greer was picking and choosing the evidence against the husband. I don't know what law he broke - BUT THAT IS A VIOLATION OF HIS OFFICE AS A JUDGE - AND HE'S GOING TO END UP IN VERY BIG TROUBLE FOR IT.