Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop

I agree with number 1, but I take exception with "the taking of an innocent life is always wrong."

There are situations, such as collateral damage in war, when the taking of innocent life cannot be avoided, and therefore is not wrong, only tragic.


4 posted on 03/25/2005 9:03:29 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Tagline schmagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Chandler
I phrased it as absolute. Obviously, it doesn't cover situations in which an innocent life is taken in other circumstances such as war, in which the loss of life is a tragedy as you rightly observed and not a sin. I read it to cover every other situation in which an innocent life is deliberately taken, contrary to moral and human law. We need a clear dividing line to recognize what is and what is not permissable. Perhaps if our society acknowledged it, we would not be where we are today.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
5 posted on 03/25/2005 9:08:06 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson